Facebook’s Libra Cryptocurrency
On June 18, 2019, Facebook and 27 other organizations announced the creation of a new cryptocurrency called Libra and the Calibra platform; according to the EFE News Agency, this cryptocurrency could be used both for transactions between individuals and for purchases at retail establishments.
To that end, the Libra Association was established, with its headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, to oversee and develop the cryptocurrency. The promoters justified the choice of this location because Switzerland has a history of neutrality and global openness to blockchain technology, and because the association aspired to be an international and neutral institution.
In addition to Facebook, the founding members included Visa, Mastercard, Vodafone, PayPal, eBay, Spotify, Uber, Lyft, Booking Holdings—owner of Booking.com, Priceline.com, and Kayak.com—and Mercado Libre, among other companies.
Background on the 2019 Launch of Libra
The announcement of Libra came at a time of growing interest in cryptocurrencies, blockchain technology, and new digital payment systems. Until then, much of the public debate on cryptoassets had focused on currencies such as Bitcoin, their volatility, their potential use as an investment asset, and the challenges they posed for regulators, central banks, and tax authorities.
Facebook’s proposal introduced a unique element: it was not merely a project driven by a tech community or a specialized financial firm, but rather an initiative linked to one of the world’s largest digital platforms, with the potential to reach millions of users through everyday apps.
From a legal perspective, the project’s initial appeal lay not only in the creation of a new cryptocurrency, but also in the potential emergence of a global, private, digital payment infrastructure promoted by major technology and financial companies.
What Libra Was, According to the Initial Presentation
The stated goal was for Libra to function as a stable cryptocurrency that could be used for everyday transactions, with minimal fluctuations in value. To this end, the plan was to back it with a portfolio of real, low-volatility assets—specifically, bank deposits and short-term government securities denominated in currencies issued by stable, reputable central banks.
In fact, the so-called Libra Reserve was intended to act as a buyer of last resort, providing stability to the system and distinguishing the project from cryptocurrencies whose value depended primarily on supply, demand, and trading on secondary markets.
Libra was based on blockchain technology. However, it could not be mined and, consequently, could not be produced by users in exchange for computing power. This feature set it apart from other decentralized cryptocurrencies in which the issuance of new units could be linked to mining processes.
The Role of the Libra Association
The Libra Association presented itself as an independent organization responsible for overseeing the project’s progress, developing the network, and managing key aspects of the cryptocurrency’s operation. Its headquarters in Geneva reinforced the idea of an organization with an international and neutral focus.
The fact that companies from the payments, telecommunications, e-commerce, transportation, music streaming, and digital platforms sectors were involved underscored the scope of the project. Libra was not conceived solely as a digital currency for Facebook users, but as a system capable of being integrated into a wide range of services and commercial environments.
This design raised important legal questions regarding governance, liability, oversight, risk management, user protection, and relations with financial authorities in the various countries where the cryptocurrency might be used.
What role would Calibra play?
A digital wallet for the cryptocurrency Libra would be offered, initially accessible through WhatsApp and Messenger—both owned by Facebook—although the plan was to expand it in the future to other services such as Instagram or the Facebook website itself.
The wallet would also have its own standalone app for Android and iOS operating systems, with a planned launch in 2020 according to the project’s initial presentation.
On the other hand, the Calibra platform would facilitate user interactions with Libra. Initially, it would offer basic functions for sending and receiving money, although other types of financial services were also planned for the future.
From a legal standpoint, Calibra raised important issues regarding user identification, fraud prevention, data protection, transaction security, and potential liability toward users who used the digital wallet to transfer funds.
Why Libra Was Positioned as a Stablecoin
One of the main differences between Libra and other cryptocurrencies was its goal of maintaining a more stable value. To achieve this, the project relied on the idea of a reserve composed of low-volatility assets, such as bank deposits and short-term government securities.
This structure was intended to make Libra useful for everyday payments, rather than just for investment, speculation, or a store of value. In the initial plan, stability was essential so that individuals and businesses could use it as a means of payment without being exposed to sharp price fluctuations.
However, that very pursuit of stability raised regulatory concerns from the outset, because the existence of a global cryptocurrency backed by financial assets could have implications for payment systems, financial supervision, and monetary policy.
Key Differences from Other Cryptocurrencies Such as Bitcoin
In 2019, a common comparison was made between Libra and Bitcoin. Although both were related to blockchain technology, they differed significantly in their design and purpose.
Bitcoin had developed as a decentralized cryptocurrency, with its issuance tied to mining and without a central entity equivalent to the Libra Association. Libra, by contrast, was presented as a cryptocurrency managed within an associative structure and backed by a reserve of assets.
Their practical purposes also differed. While Bitcoin was often analyzed as a decentralized digital asset and investment vehicle, Libra was presented as a tool for everyday payments and peer-to-peer transfers, intended for widespread use within digital services.
Key Initial Regulatory Concerns
Central banks had already expressed concern about Libra’s implications for the economy. In this regard, U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell stated that Libra would require very close scrutiny due to its enormous scope.
The U.S. Congress, specifically the House Financial Services Committee, urged Facebook to put the project on hold until Congress could debate it. Undoubtedly, the lack of regulatory safeguards, coupled with concerns about security, privacy, and potential misuse, raised questions about the risks it could pose to the financial economy, monetary policy, and the government’s control over it.
Initial concerns centered on several areas: the potential concentration of power in large technology platforms, user protection, the processing of personal data, the prevention of money laundering, illicit financing, financial stability, and the ability of authorities to oversee a global payment network.
Legal Significance of the Libra Project in 2019
The Libra project was of obvious legal interest in 2019 because it raised a novel issue: the possibility that a private network, driven by major technology and financial companies, could develop a global cryptocurrency for payments and transfers.
The debate was not limited to whether or not Libra was just another cryptocurrency. The real legal question was how regulators should respond to a project that combined blockchain technology, digital payments, personal data, asset reserves, major technology platforms, and the potential for massive user adoption.
From this perspective, Libra became an early example of the challenges that digital assets could pose when they ceased to be niche phenomena and became part of the business strategies of major international operators.
Preguntas frecuentes sobre la criptomoneda Libra de Facebook
¿Qué fue Libra de Facebook?
Libra fue un proyecto de criptomoneda presentado por Facebook en 2019 junto con otras organizaciones internacionales. Su objetivo inicial era crear una moneda digital estable que pudiera utilizarse para pagos, transferencias entre particulares y compras en establecimientos.
¿Qué era la Asociación Libra?
La Asociación Libra era la entidad creada para desarrollar y supervisar el proyecto. Tenía sede en Ginebra, Suiza, y estaba integrada inicialmente por empresas tecnológicas, financieras, de pagos, comercio electrónico, transporte y servicios digitales.
¿Qué función tenía Calibra?
Calibra era la cartera digital prevista para operar con Libra. Inicialmente se planteó su integración con servicios como WhatsApp y Messenger, además de una aplicación independiente para dispositivos móviles.
¿Por qué Libra se presentaba como una criptomoneda estable?
Porque el proyecto pretendía respaldar Libra con una reserva de activos de baja volatilidad, como depósitos bancarios y títulos gubernamentales de corto plazo. La finalidad era reducir las oscilaciones de valor y facilitar su uso como medio de pago.
¿En qué se diferenciaba Libra de Bitcoin?
Bitcoin es una criptomoneda descentralizada, con emisión vinculada a minería y sin una entidad central de control. Libra, en cambio, se planteaba como una moneda digital gestionada por una asociación y respaldada por una reserva de activos.
¿Libra podía ser minada por los usuarios?
No. A diferencia de otras criptomonedas basadas en minería, Libra no estaba diseñada para que los usuarios generaran nuevas unidades mediante poder computacional. Su funcionamiento se vinculaba a la estructura definida por el proyecto y su reserva.
¿Qué preocupaciones regulatorias generó Libra?
Libra generó preocupación por su posible impacto en los sistemas de pago, la estabilidad financiera, la política monetaria, la protección de datos, la prevención del blanqueo de capitales y la concentración de poder en grandes plataformas tecnológicas.
¿Por qué interesaba jurídicamente el proyecto Libra?
Porque planteaba la posibilidad de una infraestructura privada global de pagos digitales impulsada por grandes empresas tecnológicas y financieras. Esto abría importantes debates sobre supervisión, responsabilidad, protección del usuario y control regulatorio.
¿Libra estaba pensada solo para usuarios de Facebook?
No. Aunque Facebook impulsó el proyecto y Calibra se vinculaba inicialmente a servicios como WhatsApp y Messenger, Libra se presentó como una infraestructura de alcance más amplio, susceptible de integrarse en distintos servicios digitales y comerciales.
¿Qué enseñanza dejó Libra para la regulación cripto?
Libra mostró que los criptoactivos podían dejar de ser proyectos de nicho para convertirse en infraestructuras de pagos con potencial alcance masivo. Por ello, anticipó debates regulatorios sobre stablecoins, supervisión financiera, protección de usuarios y responsabilidad de grandes plataformas digitales.
Lawyers Specializing in Cryptocurrencies and Technology | IN DIEM: Málaga, Seville, Madrid, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Almería, Huelva…
IN DIEM Abogados provides legal advice on matters related to cryptocurrency law, crypto projects, digital platforms, anti-money laundering, transactions involving digital assets, and legal risks associated with new technologies.
Legal advice may be relevant for companies, investors, platforms, and individuals who need to analyze contracts, liabilities, regulatory compliance, taxation, fraud prevention, user relations, or potential disputes arising from transactions involving cryptoassets.
Services related to cryptocurrencies and digital assets include:
- Legal advice on projects based on cryptocurrency and blockchain technology.
- Review of contracts, terms of use, and conditions for digital platforms.
- Prevention of Money Laundering and Risk Analysis in Transactions Involving Digital Assets.
- Advice on claims against platforms, intermediaries, or third parties.
- Legal analysis of investment transactions, purchases, sales, or transfers of cryptoassets.
- Study of Legal Risks Associated with Wallets, Exchanges, and Technology Services.
Did you know that Abogados IN DIEM offers online and expedited services?
We offer our clients the option of receiving assistance via video call or videoconference, as well as by phone, depending on their preference, so that the assistance is as personalized as possible, provided immediately, and without the need to travel. This service is complemented by communication via email, which facilitates the review and delivery of documentation.
In addition, for businesses and individuals, IN DIEM Abogados offers urgent services and 24-hour support for matters that require a quick response.
Would you like to know more about IN DIEM Abogados? Here is this short introductory video…
To acknowledge some of you, here’s this link.
You can find us in Seville, Madrid, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Málaga, Tomares, Coria del Río, Dos Hermanas, Mairena del Alcor, Estepona, Marbella, and Mairena del Aljarafe. We look forward to serving you.
