MXC Bit2Me Claim: Transaction Cancellation and Funds Blocking

Cryptocurrency image over a chart to illustrate legal claims against cryptocurrency exchanges.

If you have been affected by the incident involving the MXC price on Bit2Me, with trade cancellations, funds freezes, or claims for the return of amounts, it is important for you to know that you can file a claim in the MXC Bit2Me case.

At IN DIEM Abogados, we are legally analysing the situation and representing users who have suffered financial losses resulting from unilateral decisions adopted by the platform.

In this article, we analyse what happened, whether the cancellation of trades is lawful, what happens with account freezes, and how to bring a claim against Bit2Me regarding the MXC token incident.

What happened with the MXC price on Bit2Me?

During the first weeks of January, there was a significant increase in the price of the MXC token that was reflected on the Bit2Me platform, allowing the normal execution of buy and sell orders.

In that context, two main situations occurred:

  • Users who executed sell orders at the price shown by the platform and generated euro balances, even withdrawing funds to their bank accounts.
  • Users who tried to sell during that same period but were unable to do so due to technical limitations of the system.

Subsequently, the platform alleged the existence of a material technical error and adopted internal measures that included:

  • Cancellation of trades already executed.
  • Adjustments or deductions from euro balances.
  • Preventive account freeze.
  • Claims for reimbursement of withdrawn amounts.

MXC Bit2Me Claim: Can an exchange cancel trades that have already been executed?

When a platform displays a price, allows an order to be executed, and settles the result in the user’s account, the trade produces real economic effects within the system.

The central legal issue in an MXC Bit2Me claim is determining whether the platform can unilaterally reverse a trade that has already been executed and alter its financial consequences.

This is not solely about the existence of a technical incident, but about:

  • How that incident was handled.
  • Whether the measures adopted were proportionate.
  • Whether the user’s contractual rights were respected.
  • Whether there was good faith in the execution and subsequent reversal.

In digital trading environments, the technological infrastructure is part of the service provided. If the system confirms an execution, we are dealing with a transaction generated within that architecture.

Inability to sell MXC: loss of opportunity

In the case of users who were unable to place orders during the period of high volatility, the legal analysis is different but equally relevant.

It must be assessed:

  • Whether the system remained active for other users.
  • Whether the limitation was selective or general.
  • Whether there was a loss of opportunity that can be economically assessed.
  • The causal link between the technical incident and the loss suffered.

The inability to trade at a critical moment in the market may give rise to liability if the loss is substantiated.

Blocking of funds and accounts on Bit2Me

One of the most sensitive aspects of the MXC case is the freezing of euro and crypto-asset balances.

Restricting the availability of funds requires:

  • Clear technical justification.
  • Sufficient contractual basis.
  • Proportionality of the measure.
  • Respect for assets not directly linked to the disputed trade.

The handling of a technical incident cannot automatically become a widespread alteration of the user’s assets.

Regulatory framework: MiCA and protection of crypto users

The MXC Bit2Me incident occurs in a regulatory context in which the MiCA Regulation strengthens obligations regarding:

  • Operational resilience.
  • Technology governance.
  • Transparency in incident management.
  • Protection of users and their assets.

Platforms must demonstrate that their corrective actions meet standards of diligence, responsibility, and contractual balance.

How to start an MXC Bit2Me claim

At IN DIEM Abogados, we offer a comprehensive service for handling claims against exchanges in cases of:

  • Cancellation of executed trades.
  • Blocking of accounts or funds.
  • Unilateral set-offs.
  • Loss of opportunity due to inability to trade.

Our involvement includes:

  • Full technical and legal analysis of the trading activity.
  • Review of contractual terms and conditions.
  • Assessment of trade traceability.
  • Preparation of formal claims against the platform.
  • Representation before the competent bodies and, where applicable, in court.

Frequently asked questions about the MXC Bit2Me claim

Preguntas frecuentes sobre la reclamación MXC Bit2Me

¿Qué es la reclamación MXC Bit2Me?

La reclamación MXC Bit2Me se refiere a las posibles acciones legales de usuarios afectados por incidencias relacionadas con la cotización del token MXC en Bit2Me, incluyendo anulaciones de operaciones, bloqueos de fondos, ajustes de saldos o reclamaciones de devolución de importes.

¿Puede un exchange anular operaciones ya ejecutadas?

Depende del caso concreto, de las condiciones contractuales de la plataforma, de cómo se ejecutó la orden y de la justificación técnica alegada. Si una operación fue confirmada, liquidada y generó efectos económicos reales, debe analizarse si la anulación unilateral fue proporcional, transparente y conforme a contrato.

¿Qué ocurre si Bit2Me bloqueó fondos o saldos en euros?

El bloqueo de fondos debe contar con una base contractual o jurídica suficiente, estar debidamente justificado y ser proporcional. Es importante revisar si el bloqueo afecta únicamente a la operación discutida o si se ha extendido a otros saldos o criptoactivos no vinculados directamente con la incidencia.

¿Puedo reclamar si no pude vender MXC durante la incidencia?

Sí, puede valorarse una reclamación por pérdida de oportunidad si se acredita que el usuario intentó operar, que la plataforma impidió la ejecución de la orden y que existía una oportunidad económica real. Será necesario analizar pruebas, registros, capturas, comunicaciones y trazabilidad de la operativa.

¿Qué pruebas conviene conservar para reclamar?

Conviene conservar capturas de pantalla, justificantes de órdenes ejecutadas o rechazadas, historial de operaciones, saldos antes y después de la incidencia, comunicaciones con Bit2Me, correos electrónicos, tickets de soporte, extractos bancarios y cualquier documento que acredite el perjuicio sufrido.

¿Qué papel tiene MiCA en este tipo de incidencias?

El Reglamento MiCA refuerza las obligaciones de transparencia, gobernanza, resiliencia operativa y protección de usuarios en el ámbito de los criptoactivos. En una reclamación frente a un exchange, puede ser relevante analizar si la gestión de la incidencia se ajustó a esos estándares regulatorios.

¿Es necesario reclamar primero ante la plataforma?

En muchos casos es recomendable presentar una reclamación formal ante la plataforma antes de acudir a otras vías. Esa reclamación debe exponer los hechos, cuantificar el perjuicio si es posible, aportar pruebas y solicitar una respuesta motivada sobre la anulación, bloqueo o ajuste aplicado.

¿Qué puede reclamar un usuario afectado?

Según el caso, puede reclamarse la restitución de saldos, la eliminación de bloqueos injustificados, la compensación por operaciones anuladas, la devolución de importes indebidamente detraídos o la indemnización por perjuicios acreditados, incluida una posible pérdida de oportunidad.

¿Por qué conviene un análisis técnico-jurídico?

Porque este tipo de reclamaciones combina aspectos contractuales, tecnológicos, regulatorios y patrimoniales. Es necesario revisar la operativa dentro de la plataforma, las condiciones de uso, la trazabilidad de las órdenes, la justificación del error técnico y el impacto económico real para el usuario.

¿Cómo puede ayudar IN DIEM Abogados?

IN DIEM Abogados puede analizar la documentación del usuario afectado, revisar las condiciones contractuales, valorar la viabilidad de la reclamación, preparar escritos frente a la plataforma y estudiar posibles vías ante organismos competentes o en sede judicial si la situación lo requiere.


If you have been affected by the MXC incident on Bit2Me, it is important to act quickly. Each case must be analysed individually to determine the viability of the claim and the most appropriate strategy.

At IN DIEM Abogados, we are already acting in defence of those affected and will continue to pursue the necessary actions to ensure the protection of their financial rights.


Did you know that Abogados IN DIEM offers online and expedited services?

We offer our clients the option of receiving assistance via video call or videoconference, as well as by phone, depending on their preference, so that the assistance is as personalized as possible, provided immediately, and without the need to travel. This service is complemented by communication via email, which facilitates the review and delivery of documentation.

In addition, for businesses and individuals, IN DIEM Abogados offers urgent services and 24-hour support for matters that require a quick response.


Anything else about IN DIEM Lawyers? Here’s a short presentation video…

You can find us in Seville, Madrid, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Málaga, Huelva, Punta Umbría, Tomares, Coria del Río, Dos Hermanas, Mairena del Alcor, Estepona, Marbella, and Mairena del Aljarafe. We look forward to serving you.

To acknowledge some of you, here’s this link.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Legal Vision

Other posts on our blog that might interest you

BNEXT Is Unable to Operate: Issues with the Token and Legal Analysis Under MiCA. Real-Life Case

How does CNMV supervision work under MiCA?

Errors in Crypto Tax Software: How Our Technical Debugging Prevented €27,600 in Unnecessary Taxes

Legal remedies and actions after an airport detention: how to challenge a refusal of entry in Spain

DAC7: What the Tax Agency Does with Received Data and How It Uses It in Inspections. What Do They Review and How to Defend Yourself?

DAC7 in Spain: what it is, who it affects, and how it impacts digital platforms and companies