IMPORTANT: This article was written in accordance with the legal debate existing at the time of its publication regarding Article 94 of the Civil Code and the possible suspension of visitation, communication, and residency rights in cases involving domestic or gender-based violence. It should be noted that the Constitutional Court has subsequently interpreted this provision to mean that it does not entail an automatic suspension; rather, it is up to the judicial authority to assess each case through a reasoned decision, always taking into account the best interests of the child. It is advisable to review the situation in light of the regulations and case law currently in force.
Limitation and suspension of the right to visitation and stay
The presiding judge of the Court of First Instance 7 of Móstoles, Natalia Velilla, has raised a question of unconstitutionality regarding the fourth paragraph of Article 94 of the Civil Code, as it establishes “automatically” a sanction of a civil nature as a consequence of criminal proceedings.
The Case
The father of a minor child requests the Court to suspend custody in favor of the mother, as a consequence of the mother having been reported by him to an Investigating Court for allegedly maintaining inappropriate behavior and having struck him.
Therefore, pursuant to the fourth paragraph of Article 94 of the Civil Code, the visitation or stay regime of the minor with the mother would be suspended, despite the fact that in the Investigating Court where the complaint for domestic violence against the mother is being investigated, no interim measure has been adopted as it is considered that there is no risk to the minor.
Article 94 of the Civil Code
This was reformed. In its wording in force until September 3, 2021, it established that the parent who does not have the minor or incapacitated children with them shall enjoy the right to visit them, communicate with them, or have them in their company, with the Judge determining the time, manner, and place of exercising this right.
Until September 3, 2021, the Judge had the possibility to limit or suspend the right to
visitation and stay in the indicated cases. But from that date, the article was modified and displaced the legal position established until that date regarding the right to visitation and stays.
Article 94 of the Civil Code, as reformed, establishes the following:
“The establishment of a visitation or stay regime shall not proceed, and if it existed it shall be suspended, with respect to the parent who is involved in criminal proceedings initiated for attempting against the life, physical integrity, freedom, moral integrity, or freedom and sexual indemnity of the other spouse or their children. Nor shall it proceed when the judicial authority notices, from the parties’ allegations and the evidence presented, the existence of well-founded indications of domestic or gender-based violence. However, the judicial authority may establish a visitation, communication, or stay regime in a reasoned resolution in the best interest of the minor or in the will, wishes, and preferences of the adult with disability in need of support and following an evaluation of the parent-child relationship situation.”
Consequence of the reform
The new wording of this article presents a main consequence, which is that it prevents the Judge from establishing a visitation and stay regime, and obliges them to suspend the one that had been previously determined.
This gives rise to the understanding that the fundamental right to the presumption of innocence, contained in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 11, is not being respected, which establishes that every person accused of a crime has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, in accordance with the law and in a public trial in which all necessary guarantees for their defense have been ensured.
A second consequence that may arise is that it may favor abusive use of the regulation, because the time that the parent who has been reported may remain without the right to visitation or stay with their children is not determined, so this may be favorable for parent-child, economic, or patrimonial measures that are yet to be determined to be decided in favor of one parent.
Motion for a Declaration of Unconstitutionality
It is for this reason that the presiding judge of the Court of First Instance 7 of Móstoles understands that the fourth paragraph of Article 94 of the Civil Code violates the right to the presumption of innocence. Therefore, she raises a question of unconstitutionality, considering that the regulation establishes practically “automatically” a sanction of a civil nature as a consequence of criminal proceedings.
The Magistrate also raises the possible violation of Article 10.1 of the Spanish Constitution, which enshrines the right of minors to the free development of their personality. She also raises it with respect to Article 14, which establishes that Spaniards are equal before the law.
The new wording of Article 94 raises practically unanimous criticism among specialists. Cristina Díaz-Malnero concludes that “The problem is wanting to put all family situations in the same basket and solve them with the same criterion, when each case is a world of its own”
Author: Ángela Victoria Cantizano de la Rosa
Preguntas frecuentes sobre la limitación y suspensión del régimen de visitas
¿Puede limitarse o suspenderse el régimen de visitas?
Sí. El régimen de visitas puede limitarse o suspenderse cuando existan circunstancias que lo justifiquen, especialmente si puede existir un riesgo para el menor o si concurren situaciones de violencia doméstica, violencia de género u otros factores que afecten a su bienestar.
¿La existencia de una denuncia penal suspende automáticamente las visitas?
No debe entenderse de forma automática. La autoridad judicial debe valorar las circunstancias concretas del caso, los indicios existentes, la situación familiar y el interés superior del menor, dictando una resolución motivada cuando proceda establecer, limitar o suspender el régimen de visitas.
¿Qué papel tiene el interés superior del menor?
El interés superior del menor es el criterio principal en cualquier decisión sobre visitas, comunicación o estancia. El juez debe valorar qué medida protege mejor su seguridad, estabilidad emocional, desarrollo personal y relación con ambos progenitores cuando sea posible y beneficioso.
¿Qué ocurre si existen indicios de violencia doméstica o de género?
Si existen indicios fundados de violencia doméstica o de género, el juzgado puede acordar la no fijación, limitación o suspensión del régimen de visitas, comunicación o estancia. La decisión debe adoptarse valorando la situación concreta y la protección del menor.
¿Puede acordarse un régimen de visitas aunque exista un proceso penal?
En determinados casos, la autoridad judicial puede establecer un régimen de visitas, comunicación o estancia si lo considera compatible con el interés superior del menor y lo razona expresamente. También puede acordar medidas de protección o supervisión cuando resulte necesario.
¿Qué debe hacer un progenitor afectado por la suspensión de visitas?
Debe revisar la resolución judicial, reunir la documentación relevante y solicitar asesoramiento jurídico especializado. Cada caso debe analizarse individualmente para valorar si procede recurrir, pedir medidas alternativas o solicitar una modificación cuando cambien las circunstancias.
Lawyers Specializing in Family Law | IN DIEM: Málaga, Seville, Madrid, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Almería, Huelva…
Lawyers IN DIEM has extensive experience and a high degree of specialization in the area of Family Law and, in particular, interim measures, provisional or very provisional measures, modification of measures, enforcement of judgments, divorces, separation of de facto couples, offering its clients the best defense and the best lawyers.
Abogados IN DIEM has a team with experience in roles such as magistrate, state attorney, prosecutor, and university professor, which will give you peace of mind and confidence, knowing you have the best team—one that is competitive and highly qualified to achieve your goals and meet your needs.
We are at your disposal for whatever you need. You can reach us through the IN DIEM Lawyers Telephone (+34) 901 900 071. In cases of Emergencies you have us at the 24-Hour Emergency Lawyers Telephone IN DIEM: (+34) 610 667 452.
Among our services, the following stand out:
- Separation/Divorce
- Notarial Divorces
- De Facto Couples
- Child Custody
- Parental Authority
- Modification of Measures
- Termination of Child Support
- Regulatory Agreements
- Non-Compliance with Visitation Regime
- Claim for Child Support
- Compensatory Pension
- Liquidation of Community Property
- Paternity
- Filiation
- Family Mediation
- Adoptions
- Incapacity and guardianships
Did you know that Abogados IN DIEM offers online and expedited services?
We offer our clients the option of receiving assistance via video call or videoconference, as well as by phone, depending on their preference, so that the assistance is as personalized as possible, provided immediately, and without the need to travel. This service is complemented by communication via email, which facilitates the review and delivery of documentation.
In addition, for businesses and individuals, IN DIEM Abogados offers urgent services and 24-hour support for matters that require a quick response.
Would you like to know more about IN DIEM Abogados? Here is this short introductory video…
To acknowledge some of you, here’s this link.
You can find us in Seville, Madrid, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Málaga, Tomares, Coria del Río, Dos Hermanas, Mairena del Alcor, Estepona, Marbella, and Mairena del Aljarafe. We look forward to serving you.
